Chapter 1: The Early Days of Coding

In the beginning, my drive to write elegant code was unwavering. I was fueled by a desire to create clean, readable code that could withstand the test of time.

Initially, I was captivated by the book "Readable Code," which left a lasting impression on me. During that period, there was a strong emphasis on fundamental principles, and our team adhered strictly to coding standards that prioritized beauty in programming.

Section 1.1: The Challenge of Refactoring

When I joined a large-scale Android project, I encountered a codebase that was far from ideal. It seemed to have been crafted by novice Java developers, making it a challenge to work with. Determined to improve it, I undertook the task of refactoring, which felt both fulfilling and purposeful. My goal was to produce code that was as comprehensible as possible.

Subsection 1.1.1: The Shift to Code Reviews

With our team transitioning to Git, I spearheaded the introduction of code reviews based on pull requests. My newfound focus on code quality led me to provide extensive feedback, particularly when reviewing submissions from new Android developers or recent graduates. I became keenly aware of the nuances of variable naming, conditional statements, and method structures.

Chapter 2: A Shift in Passion

Recently, I’ve noticed that many of the design trends in the Android sphere seem unnecessarily complicated. However, my primary concern today is that I find myself increasingly indifferent to the finer details of code.

In the video titled "What to do when you lose your passion for coding?", the discussion revolves around maintaining enthusiasm for programming despite evolving challenges.

As time has passed, the prevalence of inexperienced Java programmers producing messy code has diminished. With Kotlin now being the primary language, it naturally supports readability and safety, allowing me to produce high-quality code without excessive concern.

Despite this evolution, the quest for writing superior code persists among developers. Many still debate the merits of various Kotlin scope functions and how they can enhance readability by aligning closer to natural language.

During development, conversations often arise about the efficiency of using certain coding techniques, including whether an existing loop can be optimized with Rx functions. Occasionally, the methods suggested may not compile correctly or yield unexpected results, leading to bugs.

Some developers are eager to share their code, while others express strong opinions against nullable types and reassignment, going to great lengths to avoid them. Yet, I find myself less concerned with these debates.

If code lacks readability or is prone to bugs, it's essential to address these issues, but I believe it’s equally important to suggest improvements that lead to cleaner code.

In the grand scheme, spending more than a day on GitHub exchanges or enduring lengthy explanations to resolve complex issues raises the question: what are the actual benefits? Wouldn't it be more productive to focus on tangible progress within tight deadlines and an endless array of tasks?

Perhaps it's more beneficial to address the overall structure of our packages, organize classes logically, or provide comments on original courses that might be difficult to comprehend without documentation.

I often find myself thinking along these lines. However, teams that engage in active code discussions are often viewed as exemplary. I once aspired to be part of such an environment. Now, I believe there might be value in offering guidance and education through new employee training, beginner reviews, or internal study sessions to foster better coding practices.

Is this perspective a result of growth as an engineer, or a sign that my passion for programming is waning as I transition into a more seasoned role? At times, I grapple with feelings of inadequacy, which can be unsettling.

Thank you for taking the time to read my reflections. If you found value in this, please consider showing your support!