The Humility We Lack in Addressing Global Warming
Written on
Chapter 1: The Conflict Between Economy and Ecology
In contemporary political discourse, the relationship between economic advancement and ecological preservation is often viewed as antagonistic. Generally, progress in the economy is tied to the depletion of the planet's natural resources.
Corine Pelluchon, a philosophy professor at the University Gustav Eiffel, articulates in her 2021 essay "Ecology as New Enlightenment," published in the Global Solutions Journal, that our understanding of the environment—termed eco-phenomenology—provides a fresh foundation for a social contract. She asserts:
“Ecology extends beyond its environmental aspects, often linked solely to combating global warming. It encompasses a social dimension tied to how we organize work and distribute resources fairly.”
Pelluchon emphasizes that due to the ecological crisis intensified by global warming, we hold a duty to future generations to ensure that our economic, ecological, and social resources remain sustainable. Additionally, we share a responsibility towards other living beings, including animals. Human beings often overlook their reliance on nature and the ways it sustains their lives.
Governments should focus not only on economic equity and freedom but also on a profound ecological responsibility, which aligns with the principles of the Enlightenment, such as autonomy, democracy, and the understanding that we inhabit a single planet.
This brings us to a significant dilemma. The debate surrounding whether economic growth accelerates the depletion of our natural resources and exacerbates global warming is a contentious one in political circles. Pelluchon presents a straightforward yet thought-provoking suggestion: humanity must shed its arrogance.
We need to bridge the gap between nature and civilization and challenge the narrow anthropocentrism that has shaped our upbringing. “Ecology, therefore, demands humility; without it, we cannot collaborate effectively or promote the common good.”
To safeguard both non-human life and our biosphere, should we rethink our approach from what benefits humanity to what serves the common good of our shared Earth, where all life is interconnected? Anthropocentrism positions humans at the center of discourse; however, history repeatedly reminds us that we may not be the focal point of the universe.
Pelluchon advocates that through thoughtful consideration, we can appreciate the intrinsic value of nature and recognize the interconnectedness of all life forms on Earth. What are your thoughts? Can we harmonize economic growth with ecological stewardship? Is economic growth even necessary in our efforts to combat the exploitation of our planet?
References:
Corine Pelluchon. Ecology as New Enlightenment. Global Solutions Journal, 2021,
Global Solutions Journal. The World Policy Forum, 7, p. 218–223. HAL-03240808.