Bridging Science and Humanity: A New Perspective
Written on
Chapter 1: The Shift in Perspective
In March 2020, as the world grappled with the Covid-19 pandemic, I delved into E.F. Schumacher's book, “A Guide for the Perplexed.” At that time, I was a newly appointed teaching assistant professor specializing in materials science and engineering. Schumacher emphasizes the significance of philosophy and humanism in a society often preoccupied with technological advancements driven by scientific inquiry. As a member of the materials science community, I felt the weight of criticism for dedicating my efforts primarily to the pursuit of new materials and the so-called “hard” sciences.
The insights from the book made me realize how long I had been distanced from the realms of social and philosophical sciences, despite holding a Doctorate in Philosophy. There’s no denying the monumental influence science has had on human civilization. The scientific revolution, which unfolded between 1543 and 1687, marked a pivotal era in our history, leading to groundbreaking discoveries such as the heliocentric theory by Copernicus, Newton’s laws of motion, the establishment of the experimental method by Francis Bacon, and the invention of the microscope. These advancements fundamentally altered our comprehension of the universe and our interaction with it. However, shortly after this era of scientific enlightenment, England entered the “Age of Sensibility” from 1740 to 1800.
During this phase, individuals began to reconnect with the human experience, valuing compassion, empathy, and emotional insight over mere scientific rationality. Although there exists a distinct contrast between the scientific revolution and the Age of Sensibility, both epochs significantly contributed to shaping contemporary culture and human society.
Chapter 2: The Challenge of Communication
Today, scientists who strive to articulate the relevance of their work within the context of human life often face pushback from peers. Prominent figures in science communication, such as Carl Sagan, Neil deGrasse Tyson, and Albert Einstein, have encountered criticism from within the scientific community. Some claimed Sagan's informal approach lacked the necessary rigor, while Tyson has been accused of prioritizing personal narratives over objective science, particularly in relation to religious beliefs. Einstein faced scrutiny for his perceived inaction regarding civil rights for African Americans during his time in the U.S.
Criticism is not limited to established scientists; for instance, science communicator @astro_alexandra, despite her expertise in human and organizational development, has faced online backlash over her perceived lack of formal scientific credentials and unwarranted gender-based disparagement. It appears that both scientists and humanists are expected to remain confined to their respective domains, refraining from personal experiences to maintain credibility and avoid controversy. While criticism can drive productive discourse in science, it should remain constructive, fostering an understanding that scientific and humanistic perspectives are not inherently opposed.
This video, titled "BUILDING A BRIDGE - PART 1 | Science Max Season 1 Full Episode," explores the intersection of science and everyday experiences, demonstrating how science can be applied in real-world scenarios.
Chapter 3: The Intersection of Science and Humanism
Viewing the physical world through a humanistic lens enhances our understanding of the challenges scientists aim to address. While physics seeks to uncover the laws of nature, humanism aspires to grasp the complexities of human behavior. When these two fields converge, we gain insights into our role in the universe and how we can leverage our understanding of nature to uplift humanity and foster community well-being.
One of my most cherished initiatives at this intersection is the 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering, launched by the National Academy of Engineering in 2008. This initiative aims to tackle pressing societal issues by offering innovative solutions. Among these challenges are making solar energy more economical, achieving sustainable fusion energy, and ensuring access to clean water. By integrating insights from both the natural and humanistic sciences, we can pave the way for a brighter future for all.
Chapter 4: Inspiration from the Next Generation
Throughout the pandemic, I found inspiration in the zeal of Gen Z college students working on projects aimed at addressing the 14 Grand Challenges of Engineering. Their excitement about topics like enhancing solar panel efficiency, developing advanced batteries, and harnessing quantum computing for problem-solving mirrored Schumacher's philosophy of integrating scientific knowledge to collaboratively tackle modern challenges.
Efforts to bolster scientists' engagement with social issues have included creating interdisciplinary programs, establishing funding opportunities that bridge the sciences, and facilitating public outreach initiatives that showcase new tools and knowledge. Schumacher advocated for a harmonious balance between scientific rationality and humanism to achieve a comprehensive understanding of our world and our place within it. I sincerely hope that, as a scientific community, we can embrace our humanistic side and direct our scientific endeavors toward the betterment of society.
The second video, "STEM Challenge: Build a Bridge," showcases innovative approaches to scientific challenges, highlighting the creativity involved in applying science to solve real-world problems.
References:
E.F. Schumacher, A Guide for the Perplexed, Abacus, 1978.
Rousseau, G. History: Science and sensibility. Nature 470, 462–463 (2011).
Grand Challenges for Engineering. [Online]. Available: http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges.aspx [Accessed: May 31, 2023].