Introduction

In software development, testing is frequently regarded as a tedious and resource-heavy task that can hinder the development process. Many developers, along with a majority of product owners, often dislike it. Nevertheless, testing is a vital component of programming, ensuring that the software functions correctly. This article will delve into the necessity for developers, product owners, and decision-makers to recognize the importance of testing and how to identify the optimal amount of automated tests for their specific situations.

We will start by discussing the pros and cons of automated testing and then shift our focus to the appropriate quantity of testing. By the conclusion of this article, you will gain insight into the essential criteria to consider when determining how much testing should be conducted in your personal or professional projects.

Disadvantages of Automated Testing

1. Time Investment (Time Equals Money)

   One significant drawback of automated testing is the initial time investment required for setting up and maintaining these tests. The process involves planning, designing, implementing, and ongoing maintenance, which can take longer initially compared to conducting manual tests. Additionally, running automated tests may necessitate specialized skills that may not be present within the development team.

2. Infrastructure Expenses

   Running automated tests on a personal computer usually incurs no cost beyond the computer itself. However, incorporating automated tests into a deployment pipeline often comes with costs once certain thresholds are surpassed. Such infrastructure expenses may pose challenges for organizations, particularly those with limited budgets.

Advantages of Automated Testing

1. Fewer Bugs

   A major benefit of automated testing is its ability to identify bugs early in the development process. Automated tests can swiftly execute hundreds or thousands of tests, catching errors that manual testing might overlook. This is particularly important when a new feature inadvertently affects another part of the application that hasn't been rechecked during manual testing. Addressing these bugs early can help developers avoid costly and time-consuming fixes later on.

   It's worth noting that this advantage is most relevant if future features and changes are anticipated. If you have already developed a flawless application that will not see further modifications, additional tests may not be necessary.

2. Improved Code Quality

   Automated testing promotes better coding practices. Since tests require code to be easily testable, developers are incentivized to write modular, decoupled, and maintainable code. This not only simplifies updates to the codebase but also reduces the likelihood of introducing new bugs during modifications. Although the benefits of code quality might not be immediate, they manifest in increased development speed and improved aesthetics over time.

   As highlighted by Dave Thomas in his renowned book, "The Pragmatic Programmer" (Amazon affiliate link, 2020), his extensive experience has shown that ceasing to write tests did not significantly degrade his code quality. He believes that the primary value of testing lies in the thought process it instigates regarding code impact. Thus, while novice developers should focus on writing automated tests, seasoned developers might choose to forgo them in favor of fostering communication with peers.

3. Enhanced Communication Among Developers

   Automated testing fosters better communication among developers by providing a common understanding of the codebase. It clarifies how different segments of the code interact and how alterations in one area can influence others, leading to more collaborative and efficient development processes.

4. Reduced Need for Manual Testing

   Automated testing can significantly decrease the reliance on manual testing, resulting in time and resource savings. Since these tests can be executed rapidly and effortlessly, developers can run them as often as necessary without manual effort.

5. Accelerated Release Cycles

   As a result of the aforementioned benefits, automated testing can expedite the software release cycle by identifying bugs and errors earlier. This allows developers to address issues promptly and efficiently, minimizing the need for extensive and costly debugging later in the process. Quicker release cycles also enable developers to introduce new features and updates more frequently, enhancing user satisfaction and potentially increasing revenue.

Determining the Right Amount of Automated Testing

There is no one-size-fits-all solution for the ideal volume of automated tests. The optimal amount is contingent on specific circumstances. From an economic perspective, testing should be undertaken when its benefits outweigh its costs. While quantifying the costs of automated testing is straightforward, estimating its benefits is more challenging. The following diagram illustrates the critical factors to consider in determining the appropriate level of testing. The benefit of testing is represented in euros on the y-axis, while the ratio of time spent writing tests to developing features is illustrated on the x-axis. For instance, a ratio of 0.5 would indicate spending one hour on testing for every two hours devoted to feature development.

Assuming the benefits of testing exhibit diminishing returns, the positive impact of improvements in code quality decreases as more testing is conducted. Conversely, developer costs remain consistent regardless of the volume of testing. This diagram serves as a general example and will vary based on individual circumstances.

Important factors influencing your project include the time horizon (viewing automated testing as an investment), the potential costs associated with software errors, desired code quality, and the current expertise of the developers.

The following scenarios illustrate three distinct testing strategies that might be appropriate:

1. Consider Avoiding Automated Tests If...
   • The project is small (< 3 months), and the code will not be reused or altered.
   • You will not continue working on the project, making future quality less relevant.
   • The costs of errors in your code are negligible (e.g., a private app with no users).
   • You dislike testing and are unwilling to improve your testing skills.
   • No team members are knowledgeable about automated testing, and there is insufficient budget to acquire that knowledge.
2. Consider Striving for 100% Code Coverage If...
   • The costs of making an error are exceedingly high, such as working for a financial institution.
3. Aim for a Balanced Approach If...
   • The costs of errors are non-zero but not severe enough to attract media attention.
   • You seek to ensure enhanced code quality (which translates to speed).
   • The project is expected to last over a month.
   • Future features are intended to be incorporated.

Conclusion

The ideal amount of automated testing that yields the highest benefit is always contingent on your project's specific circumstances. This article outlined criteria for determining the most suitable testing strategy, including time horizon, potential costs of bugs, desired future code quality, and developers' understanding of automated testing. Every team should address these aspects to formulate a testing strategy that captures critical bugs while simultaneously enhancing development efficiency through improved code quality.

Thank you for reading! If you have questions or can identify additional important advantages or disadvantages of automated testing, please share your thoughts in the comments. Your feedback is greatly appreciated!

If you found this article helpful, please clap (50x), highlight, comment, and share it. Technical articles have faced challenges due to changes in the Medium Partner Program incentives, so your engagement helps support your favorite writers. For more information about this issue, check out: The New Medium Partner Program is Bad for Quality Writing!

Additionally, explore my other articles: - What distinguishes MVC from MVVM (for Flutter)? - SOLID: Understanding the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) — Why Uncle Bob's definition may fall short. - 16 strategies to advance your Flutter skills (advanced roadmap).

Further Information

• Martin Fowler on the Test Pyramid